Skip to main content

Webinar: How to Get Employees Up to Speed in Record Time







Aloha Kākou,

I attended the webinar, "How to Get Employees Up to Speed in Record Time," presented by Arupa Tesolin and Steve Rosenbaum. No only is this topic pertinent to my professional development, but as ISC is experiencing growth and on-boarding new employees, it was a timely opportunity to gain insight into an on-going challenge faced by all organizations.

The central philosophy behind the short-duration, high-results onboarding was a focus on PROFICIENCY. I'll get to that in a minute.

First, though, overall improvement is actualized by targeting key positions. These will be the ones that: generate revenue or client results; build or service products; or solve customer problems. Pretty straight-forward...

In order to get the biggest bang for your buck (or hour) they advise:


1. Define and Measure Proficiency

2. Map the Current Learning Process

3. Accelerate the Path.





I found there to be interesting similarities of philosophy to efficiency studies of the early 20th century. Arupa talked about defining proficiency as measurable results and then describing observations of proficient employees, i.e. what you see when you watch a proficient employee. She is clear that results are to be differentiated from competencies. I cannot help but be reminded of Taylor's Scientific Management. He identified the best employees, defined measurable results and then watched how those employees produced those measurable results. You may know these studies by their nickname, the "time and motion studies." The downside of Taylor's Scientific Management was that it significantly increased the monotony of work.

So here's the foundation for the webinar:

The presenters were very clearly advocates for the use of PROFICIENCIES (Results, Action) over COMPETENCIES (Skills, Knowledge, Attributes) for bringing employees up to speed. They argue that competencies are what someone is capable of, whereas proficiencies are concerned with what they are actually doing.

Interesting that KS has core competencies, yet measures us on proficiencies (measurable results).

They argue that many trainings focus on competencies while neglecting the ACTUAL WORK. Therefore, employees will have completed "training," yet be far from PROFICIENT at their job, that is, having reached a state that their employer can just turn their back and walk away knowing that the employee is completing his or her work at the highest level. So somehow employees must get from "trained" to actually proficient on their own.


This is a nice graphic illustrating the process:








One presented example of how employees are "brought up to speed" involved two scenarios. In the first, employees attend four weeks of on-boarding class, and then take their first client call at 6 weeks. In the second, employees start taking client calls on day two. The latter situation imparts value and appreciation in and for the class and learning material and was shown to be successful in decreasing the time to proficiency.

I find this to be extremely curious because I am almost certain that IF ASKED employees would say they prefer to have training prior to being asked to make client calls. So the employees perceived reality (making phone calls without sufficient training) deters them from taking a course of action that would actually benefit them and be much more supportive to their learning (in fact, the calls were of a specific type and completed with guidance and supervision). In other words, we often do not want to immerse ourselves in unfamiliar territory, preferring to nurse ourselves along, when what we need is to be pushed into supported unfamiliarity in order to expedite the learning process.

The presenters make a good point for proficiency training, especially when you consider that the way most of us learn how to do anything is by actually doing it and that theory and logic behind actions is made much more salient when we are immediately given the opportunity to see it at work. While I fear that too much of this could result in Taylorism (to define: "Production efficiency methodology that breaks every action, job, or task into small and simple segments which can be easily analyzed and taught."), I think there is merit in providing employees the opportunity to practice the skills they need to perfect.

The webinar can be viewed here: http://trainingmagnetworkposts.posterous.com/how-to-get-employees-up-to-speed-in-record-ti

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

E pule kakou . . .

Aloha all,
I was trying to think so hard of a "techie" tip and finally gave up. I even googled "tips and tricks" for various programs and then thought "I can't blog about something I don't actually use!" Then, as I was sitting in my Papa Makua class, doing all kinds of protocal and thought about how we keep looking for a short pule to do to open our meetings. I had `A`ali`i write a pule in Hawaiian. He was worried about the grammar and structure of it so I asked Kelly C. to kökua by editing and doing an audio recording so you can hear the pronunciation. Hope it's helpful :)

E ho`omalu käkou
E kö mäkou makua i loko o ka lani
Mahalo no nä pömaika`i a pau. Mahalo no ke ali`i lokomaika`i o Pauahi a me këia kula nei. E `olu`olu, e kia`i iä mäkou i ke alahele küpono me ka lökahi.
Ke nonoi ha`aha`a nei mäkou i ka inoa o Iesu Cristo
`Ämene

`Unuhi (translation):
Let us pray
Our Father in heaven
Thank you for all the many blessings. Thank you for the generous Pri…

Papa Kuʻi ʻai a me Pohaku

As part of our huakaʻi last month to Papahana Kuaola and the opportunity to work in the loʻi, I wanted to continue that thought by sharing my experience of making a papa kuʻi 'ai (poi-pounding board).

In 2008 with the encouragement from me and my co-worker, Pili Wong, Earl Kawaʻa offered to teach a papa kuʻi ʻai papa to those of us that were interested in learning what our kūpuna did as a daily way of life. For our kūpuna they had loʻi in their yards and grew their own kalo, the major source of starch in their diet. They steamed it and pounded poi or kept it whole and sliced it and ate it like bread with butter or condensed milk.

Kawaʻa was very specific on our kuleana and the commitment he required of us. Our first task was to find an au koʻi (handle) for our koʻi (adze tool). I found myself suddenly looking up at every tree I saw looking for the right branch for my koʻi. My husband found mine at a jobsite from a Haole Koa tree otherwise known as the Leucaena Leucocephala tree. I…

Blackboard World 2008: The Power of Web 2.0

I thought I'd share a couple of Web 2.0 tools that came from a presentation that I went to at Bb World this past July that was titled "The Power of Web 2.0." The presenter was a high school teacher in a San Diego public school. She described many free tools and how she used them in her class. A couple that I thought were intersting were ToonDoo (creates comic strips and is the basis of their social network) and bubbl.us (creates mind maps). The great thing is that it's free, platform independent and no software installs. The presenter also gave her web site that lists even more Web 2.0 tools. You don't need an account to try out bubbl.us, though it does require an account for ToonDoo. I created a generic account for ToonDoo, username "vsdl", password "vsdl2008". I know mapping software is used in some of the 'Ike Hawai'i courses so maybe this would be a useful alternative. As for ToonDoo, at the very least it's entertainin…